A Matter of Perspective
Is old-growth chaparral really something that "needs" to burn in order to remain healthy? Is chaparral older than 50 years really the "trash" some have claimed?
Here are some of the typical quotes stating or implying that old-growth chaparral is in need of removal or is in some way undesirable:
"Chaparral stands older than 60 years often are decadent..."
"Eventually they (chaparral plants) get too big for their britches. The older they get, the more they look like hell in summer."
"Chamise-chaparral stands in southern California older than 60 years often are senile."
"...scrub-infested savannas."
"...chaparral-choked areas."
Chaparral "turns into a rather trashy ecosystem when it's 50 years old."
All of these are value judgments and are not supported by scientific evidence nor by informed observations of old-growth chaparral stands.